Is Family History Part of Meaningful Use Objective

March 02, 2022 Post a Comment

Making Sense of Meaningful Utilize Stage ii: Second Wave or Tsunami?

You need to fix for the next round of electronic wellness record requirements to go on it from swamping your practice.

Fam Pract Manag. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(one):xix-24.

Author disclosures: no relevant fiscal affiliations disclosed.

This content conforms to AAFP CME criteria. See FPM CME Quiz.

Article Sections

Introduction
Structural changes in meaningful use
Mighty morphing Stage i objectives
Brand new in Phase ii
Continuing challenges

For the by 3 years, many physicians and other eligible professionals have worked to comply with Stage 1 of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) electronic health records (EHR) meaningful use program. Beginning in 2014, those professionals who have completed two years of Stage 1 (or three years if they were an early on demonstrator of meaningful use in 2011) must begin on Stage 2, which makes meaning changes to the existing criteria and adds a few new rules.

This article details the major differences between Stage 1 and Phase ii requirements of meaningful utilise. We will also impact on leveraging components of meaningful use to provide excellent care for your patients as well as developing a strategy for adjusting and adapting for future stages of meaningful use.

Nosotros accept included some online resource that deal more than in depth with other Stage 2 topics, such as provider registration and changes in technology certification (see "Boosted meaningful employ resources").

Structural changes in meaningful use

Abstract
Structural changes in meaningful utilize
Mighty morphing Stage ane objectives
Brand new in Stage ii
Continuing challenges

In Stage ii, the level of Medicare incentive payments declines steadily and, first in 2015, gives mode to financial penalties of 1 percent for those who aren't meaningful users, increasing to 3 per centum in 2017. (See "Meaningful apply incentive/penalty timeline (Medicare)" and "Meaningful use incentive/penalty timeline (Medicaid)".) We believe that meaningful use Stage ii represents significantly more work for about half the coin y'all would have accomplished through Stage ane. For instance, physicians who began meaningful use in 2012 are eligible for upward to $30,000 in incentives in Stage 1 compared with upwards to $xiv,000 in Stage two. And it's still non clear how much additional investment practices will have to make to upgrade their technology or change clinical and operational workflows.

MEANINGFUL Utilise INCENTIVE/Penalty TIMELINE (MEDICARE)

MEANINGFUL Utilize INCENTIVE/PENALTY TIMELINE (MEDICAID)

There are five policy priorities that the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Engineering and CMS are trying to accomplish through the meaningful use programme – improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities; engaging patients and families in their health intendance; improving care coordination; improving population and public wellness; and ensuring adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information. These policies are broken out into the objectives that meaningful users must perform by completing the required measures.

In Stage 1, eligible professionals could satisfy the requirements by completing 20 of 25 objectives, each of which had 1 measure out. In Phase 2, an eligible professional must still complete 20 objectives, just 4 of the required objectives now accept two or more measures that need to be satisfied. This means that in Phase 2 one must satisfy a full of 26 measures.

Of those, more than one-half represent existing Phase 1 measures, most with either a larger scope or a higher threshold, and nearly half are completely new. Six Stage ane measures are beingness "retired" even though yous will however need to perform them to complete other objectives in Stage 2.

On top of this are the clinical quality measures that eligible professionals must report to CMS. That number has increased from vi to nine in Phase 2, and all providers must now report those measures whether they are participating in meaningful employ or not. Providers can use the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) to report these measures, an selection they didn't have in Stage one.

All of these changes mean that although yous may hear CMS and others say that at that place'due south not a big jump in the quantity of things you have to do from Stage i to Stage two, they are talking virtually the number of objectives and not measures.

Mighty morphing Stage 1 objectives

Abstract
Structural changes in meaningful use
Mighty morphing Stage i objectives
Brand new in Stage 2
Continuing challenges

The table "Meaningful use Stage 2 objectives and measures" lists the core set (complete all 17) and menu set (complete three of six) objectives required for Stage ii, only we'll focus first on the ones that differ significantly from what was required in Stage ane. For instance, the Stage 1 objective for computerized physician order entry required that thirty percent of patients who had at to the lowest degree one medication in their medication list had at least one medication ordered through the entry arrangement. In Stage 2, more than lx percent of medication orders have to be entered into the system electronically. Phase 2 also requires that more than 30 percent of laboratory orders and more than 30 percent of radiology orders must be entered electronically.

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE two OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES

Core Set (must complete all 17)
Objectives	Measures
Use computerized doc order entry (CPOE)*	More 60 percent of medication orders, more than than 30 per centum of laboratory orders, and more than than xxx percentage of radiology orders are recorded using CPOE.
Implement electronic prescribing (eRx)*	More than than 50 percent of all permissible prescriptions are queried for a drug formulary† and transmitted electronically.
Record patient demographics (preferred linguistic communication, gender, race, ethnicity, and engagement of birth)*	More than 80 percentage of patients have demographics recorded every bit structured data.
Record and nautical chart changes in vital signs*	More than than fourscore percent of all patients take blood pressure (age three and older only), height, and weight recorded as structured information.
Tape smoking condition*	More than than eighty percent of patients age 13 and older take smoking status recorded as structured information.
Employ clinical determination support to improve performance on high-priority health conditions*	Implement v clinical decision back up interventions related to four or more clinical quality measures. Absent-minded four clinical quality measures related to scope of practice or patient population, interventions must be related to high-priority health conditions. Enable functionality for drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks.*
Give patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information	More than than 50 per centum of all patients are provided electronic admission to their health information within 4 concern days of it existence updated in the electronic health record (EHR). More than v percent of all patients view, download, or transmit to a 3rd party their health information.
Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit*	Provide clinical summaries to patients for more than 50 percent of office visits within one business day.
Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the certified EHR technology*	Conduct or review a security adventure assay, implement security updates as necessary, and correct identified security deficiencies. Also, ensure data is stored according to encryption/storage of data regulations.
Incorporate clinical laboratory results every bit structured data†	More than 55 percent of all lab examination results reported in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in the EHR as structured data.
Generate lists of patients by conditions†	Generate at to the lowest degree one report that lists patients with a specific condition.
Identify patients needing preventive/follow-up care and transport reminders, per patient preference†	More than than 10 pct of all patients who accept had two or more than part visits in the last two years are sent an advisable reminder.
Provide patient-specific education resources to the patient as appropriate†	More than x percent of all patients are sent patient-specific pedagogy resources.
Perform medication reconciliation whenever appropriate†	Perform medication reconciliation for more than l percent of patients arriving from another care setting.
Provide summary of care records†	Provide a summary of care record for more l pct of patient referrals or transitions of intendance (expected to include an up-to-engagement problem list of current and agile diagnoses,* an active medication listing,* and an active medication allergy list*). Provide x percent of summary of care records for patient referrals or transitions of intendance either through the EHR or a properly governed wellness information exchange. Perform ane or more successful exchanges of a summary of care with a provider using an EHR developed by a unlike engineering vendor OR perform one or more than successful tests with the CMS designated exam EHR.
Be able to submit electronic information to immunization registries or immunization information systems†	Successful ongoing submission of electronic immunization data from the EHR to an immunization registry or immunization data system.
Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant wellness information	More five percent of patients send a secure message through the EHR to the md.

Carte du jour Set (must consummate three of half dozen)
Objectives	Measures
Be able to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public wellness agencies†	Successful ongoing submission of electronic syndromic surveillance data from the EHR to a public health agency.
Record electronic notes in patient records	Enter at least one electronic progress note created, edited, and signed by the physician for more than xxx percent of patients.
Exist able to provide imaging results consisting of the image itself and any explanations or other accompanying data in the EHR	More than than 10 percent of tests resulting in ane or more than images are accessible electronically.
Record patient family history as structured information	More than 20 percent of patients take history of one or more than showtime-degree relatives recorded equally structured data.
Be able to place and submit cancer case data to a public wellness cancer registry	Successful ongoing submission of cancer care information from the EHR to a public wellness central cancer registry.
Be able to identify and submit instance information to a specialized registry (other than cancer registry)	Successful ongoing submission of specific case information from the EHR to a specialized registry.

Iii other Phase 1 objectives – maintaining a patient problem list, maintaining a medication listing, and maintaining an allergy list – have been folded into the split up core objective of providing a summary of intendance when patients are referred or transferred to another provider. That means that although yous don't accept to report those to CMS anymore, y'all still must maintain a patient's problem listing, medication list, and allergy list for the other objective. Information technology reduces some of the administrative burden of meaningful utilize, but it doesn't mean you'll practise less work.

You lot will however take to provide these summaries for more than than fifty percentage of transitions and referrals, but in that location'southward a new requirement that y'all must transport 10 pct of those summaries in electronic format. This volition be more challenging, and you may desire to see if there's a health information commutation in your area that would make connecting with other providers easier. Y'all'll also want to ask your EHR vendor how they have complied with the Directly Project to make messaging more secure.

A core objective that has inverse significantly involves the office visit summary, which details what happened during the visit and includes any next steps for the patient to follow. The objective nevertheless requires providing summaries to more than 50 pct of your patients, but you now must practice it within one business organisation twenty-four hours and not the three you had in Stage 1. This essentially means you will demand to complete the summary before yous're washed seeing the patient. This volition obviously touch on your workflow if you typically finish your charting later or if you lot look two days before completing the summaries so that you can include lab or other test results. There take been questions about whether the summary is office of the medical legal document and needs to be reproducible in the event of an inspect. You lot likely won't need to reproduce the summary equally the intent is to send or give it to the patient, but if an auditor demands proof that you sent the required percentage of summaries to patients, then y'all need to have some ability to track that, probably through the EHR. Stage 2 better defines the data elements that the summary must include (in fact, three unlike summaries are defined in Stage 2), so EHR vendors should exist better able to help yous create those.

Another large modify involves patient electronic access. In Stage one, you had an optional detail to provide more 10 per centum of your patients with the ability to access their information online inside four business concern days of it existence updated and a required item to provide to more than l percent of patients, on request, an electronic copy of their wellness information within three business organization days. Stage 2 functionally replaces or eliminates these items in favor of a new core objective requiring that more 50 percent of patients be able to view, download, or transmit to a third political party their wellness information within four days of it beingness bachelor. Also, at least 5 percent of patients during the reporting menstruum must actually view, download, or transmit their health information to a 3rd party. Note that the system must be certified to practice all three, but the patient has to do just one to be counted in the five per centum. It should exist obvious that a patient portal is now necessary to achieve meaningful utilize.

The rules besides are placing more than emphasis on protecting your patients' health information. Although storing data in compliance with HIPAA was a Stage ane requirement, the rules now also demand that you encrypt that data while it is stored on disk (besides known equally "at rest"). Why? Many of the major security breaches that we've seen in the last several years occurred when mobile devices were stolen out of a practice, dwelling house, or vehicle. Y'all now must report such losses to the federal government and point the extent to which patient information may have been improperly disclosed. One time over again, cheque with your EHR vendor, and if you lot need additional information on complying with HIPAA and the new Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Deed of 2009, the American Academy of Family Physicians has a transmission.

Brand new in Stage two

Abstract
Structural changes in meaningful use
Mighty morphing Stage ane objectives
Brand new in Stage ii
Continuing challenges

A number of brand-new items may crave some additional applied science or expertise in your office. For example, your EHR at present must provide admission to radiographic imaging. You exercise not accept to store the images locally only could connect to a infirmary or imaging center that has a pic archiving and communications system to store digital results. This is a menu item, so it is optional, but if yous are already sending images or orders for imaging to a particular hospital and can access that through your EHR, this is a good card item to choose. Note that while the description of the imaging study may have already been accessible, that is not enough anymore. Information technology has to be the bodily film of the X-ray, MRI, or CT scan rather than just the radiology report.

Another new carte du jour detail requires recording family history for a first-caste relative in structured data. This could be easy to complete if your organisation can display a family member's trouble list in the family history section of the patient's record. Some other carte item is having electronic progress notes for 30 per centum of unique patients seen. These notes must be text searchable, meaning a term like "diabetes" will be highlighted in the note upon searching, like to searching a webpage.

It should be noted that in states that lack such things as cancer or disease symptom registries (the subjects of the other carte du jour items), physicians will have much less freedom in choosing bill of fare items.

Stage 2 also requires, as a core item, that more 5 percentage of patients send a secure message to you through your EHR portal. This could be problematic as it requires action by the patient for yous to achieve meaningful use. If patients aren't interested in sending you messages, how will you lot get 5 percent to do it? Time will tell how difficult this measure out is for physicians to satisfy.

Standing challenges

Abstract
Structural changes in meaningful use
Mighty morphing Stage 1 objectives
Make new in Stage 2
Continuing challenges

The meaningful use journeying – and it will continue to be a journey equally hereafter stages of meaningful use come almost – is about beingness able to adapt your practice, develop a clear vision of what you want your practice to be, establish the methods and the processes, and and so put the structures in identify then that you can achieve that vision. The challenges of meaningful use Stage two are substantial, from the significant increase in the number and difficulty of measures eligible professionals must satisfy to the implementation of patient portals and the need to persuade patients to use them. Still, while nosotros may question how the decisions of CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health It will affect our practices, this standing saga is ultimately about providing the best care possible to the patients who rely on us.

To see the full commodity, log in or purchase admission.

Nearly the Authors

Dr. Mitchell is managing director of the American Academy of Family Md's Center for Health It. Dr. Waldren is senior strategist at the Center for Health Information Technology.

Writer disclosures: no relevant financial affiliations disclosed.

Copyright © 2014 by the American University of Family unit Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the fabric and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or afterwards invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact fpmserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

MOST RECENT Issue